AO: Kenner is thinking about how digital infrastructures (the “layers of electronics, institutions, code, paradigms, experts, networks, service providers, information systems,...Read more
AO: Analysts cite Hockey (2012) who uses the term “indirect collaboration” to describe the “reusability” of data and tools produced in the academy that find application and use
AO: The analysts describe the process of community peer review as: “hiring a community member to the team; researching the social, cultural, and economic contexts of the community;
AO: The analysts used varying technologies to advertise about the meetings for community peer review. These included: “advertised the meeting on posters in the area in general stores
AO: The analysts note that information sharing embeds the notion of a “willingness to share”. They cite other literature that has found that “the more the person believes that
AO: Kenner writes: “The need and desire for digital infrastructure—often seen as a format that can extend the reach of our work—creates opportunities for collaboration with experts...Read more
AO: These analysts are worried that although Digital Humanities has collaboration built into its practice, the concept of collaboration is under theorized and also understood in
AO: The analysts are talking about a “knowledge transfer” model, talking about knowlege as if it is a concrete and discrete object that travels the same everywhere (and isn’t changed
AO: “mistake to view the crowds that are sourced as uninvested or as purely, or neatly, a means to a research end [Wolfenstein 2016].” (18)Read more
