collaboration

AO. Nayantara - data

AO: The analysts do not cover data practices themselves.

DATA: How does the analyst point to the data practices in the collaboration? Or to the data produced about the collaboration? Where does that data travel?

Nayantara Appleton et al. 2018. “Respect, Care, and Labor in Collaborative Scholarly Projects | Somatosphere.” Somatospher

Querying Analyses of Collaboration and Approaches to Data

AO. Nayantara - practices

AO: Analysts do not note specific practices but they call for “strengthening of respectful collaborative spaces for scholarship to flourish in a way that is truly concerned with...Read more

PRACTICES: What “best practices” does the analyst believe make for improved collaboration?

Nayantara Appleton et al. 2018. “Respect, Care, and Labor in Collaborative Scholarly Projects | Somatosphere.” Somatospher

Querying Analyses of Collaboration and Approaches to Data

AO. Cervone - techno

AO: The analyst describes a collaborative co-taught course on Indigenous Agency and Innovations offered in various institutions where various scholars and activists would offer a

TECHNO: (How) are technological infrastructures said to shape, enable and constrain collaboration at this stage of the research process?

Cervone, Emma. 2015. “The Promises and Conundrums of Decolonized Collaboration.” In Indigenous Studies and Engaged Anthropology: The Collaborative Moment, edited by Paul Sillitoe, 95–114. Farnham, Surrey, UK ; Burlington, VT: Ashgate.

Querying Analyses of Collaboration and Approaches to Data

AO. strategic use turning the diversity of epistemic cultures into a resource marks the politics of collaboration

AO: The analysts highlight that the strategic use turning the diversity of epistemic cultures into a resource marks the politics of collaboration. It is a bit difficult to nail

EPISTEMIC CULTURES: (How) are epistemic cultures said to shape collaboration at this stage of the research process?

Fortun, Kim, and Todd Cherkasky. “Counter‐expertise and the Politics of Collaboration.” Science as Culture 7, no. 2 (June 1998): 145–72.

Querying Analyses of Collaboration and Approaches to Data

AO. Kaplan and Rose - practices

AO: Shared commitments, intellectual, ideological and political convictions and assumptions (in this case, commitment to lucid writing; significance between popular and “high”

PRACTICES: What “best practices” does the analyst believe make for improved collaboration?

Kaplan, Carey and Cronan, Ellen Rose. "Strange Bedfellows: Feminist Collaboration,"Signs, Vol. 18, No. 3 (Spring, 1993), pp. 547-561.

Querying Analyses of Collaboration and Approaches to Data

AO. strategically engage "double binds"

AO: Strategically engaging the “double binds” within which we operate. The analysts note that “double bind situations create a persistent mismatch between explanation and everyday

PRACTICES: What “best practices” does the analyst believe make for improved collaboration?

Fortun, Kim, and Todd Cherkasky. “Counter‐expertise and the Politics of Collaboration.” Science as Culture 7, no. 2 (June 1998): 145–72.

Querying Analyses of Collaboration and Approaches to Data

AO. how does collaboration shift over time?

AO: These analysts are most interested in how collaboration shifts over time and note that organizations reposition themselves in response to new cultural forces and political-

NANO: What traits does the analyst believe make a good collaborator? Is the analyst interested in how the collaboration stabilizes or how it fails or shifts?

Fortun, Kim, and Todd Cherkasky. “Counter‐expertise and the Politics of Collaboration.” Science as Culture 7, no. 2 (June 1998): 145–72.

Querying Analyses of Collaboration and Approaches to Data

Yates‐Doerr, Emily. 2019. “Whose Global, Which Health? Unsettling Collaboration with Careful Equivocation.” American Anthropologist 121 (2): 297–310. https://doi.org/10.1111/aman.13259.

AO: This article describes Yates-Doerr's experience working with as well as studying global health scientists in Guatemala. She offers the idea of awkward collaboration to emphasize the differences that shaped interactions with scientists, and careful...Read more

AO. no analysis of practice.

AO: The authors do not talk about practice at all.Read more

PRACTICES: What “best practices” does the analyst believe make for improved collaboration?

Luukkonen, Terttu, Olle Persson, and Gunnar Sivertsen. 1992. “Understanding Patterns of International Scientific Collaboration.” Science, Technology, & Human Values 17 (1): 101–26.

Querying Analyses of Collaboration and Approaches to Data

AO. Cervone - eco

AO: She does not describe this but it would be assumed that the colonial acts of taking native lands and one's relationship to those lands.

ECO: What material constraints are said to undergird this collaboration?

Cervone, Emma. 2015. “The Promises and Conundrums of Decolonized Collaboration.” In Indigenous Studies and Engaged Anthropology: The Collaborative Moment, edited by Paul Sillitoe, 95–114. Farnham, Surrey, UK ; Burlington, VT: Ashgate.

Querying Analyses of Collaboration and Approaches to Data

AO. institutional co-authorship from a select database from 1981 - 86

“international (trans-national) institutional co-authorship from a select database from 1981 - 86 that looks at Earth and space, Math, Physics, Biomedicine; Biology; Chemistry;...Read more

MICRO: What did the analyst choose to describe as collaboration?

Luukkonen, Terttu, Olle Persson, and Gunnar Sivertsen. 1992. “Understanding Patterns of International Scientific Collaboration.” Science, Technology, & Human Values 17 (1): 101–26.

Querying Analyses of Collaboration and Approaches to Data

Search form